Thursday, September 25, 2008
Really, I do get it. I can relate because I have been on both sides of the spectrum in my life when I struggled, and when I have had more fortunate times. That is why I am so against the ideology of the Republican Platform. You would think that more people would get this, and with the way things are going maybe they will. It really depends on just how we get out of this mess.
I am fearful and skeptical of the McCain move to "Suspend" his campaign to get back to work. The skeptisism comes from knowing that he is slipping in the polls and needs to distance himself from the attitude that his party was responsible for the "do nothing" government to create this mess. On the other hand if he goes back and they do accomplish something, albeit they will come up with something even if he isn't there, he will come out boasting the propaganda that he went in and saved the world while the other candidates sat back and did nothing.
This is nothing but politics as usual and again, the public fails to see it.
We really do need a change. I again will say it is not necessarily Obama, but this country is in a mess and if we keep going along with the tide, we will end up like every other great society and come tumbling down.
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
They have their role model, candidate for President who admitted to affairs when he was married and then divorced his wife of 14 years for the newer younger version. There are claims that the imprisionment in Vietnam, or the accident his wife had lead to the divorce but his first wife put it simply that John had turned 40 and just wanted to be 25 again.
All of these claims that are coming out of the Religious Right and the Family Values Party are just lip service. It just seems to me they are so much for the rights of children and their right to life before they are born, but once they are born, they must fend for themselves. After all we can't be paying for all of these welfare children.
Friday, September 19, 2008
- School Funding MisleadsSeptember 11, 2008
An Obama ad plays fast and loose with McCain's voting record on education and proposals as a presidential candidate.
- Obama said he could “pay for every dime” of his spending and tax cut proposals “by closing corporate loopholes and tax havens.” That’s wrong
- He twisted McCain’s words about Afghanistan, saying, “When John McCain said we could just 'muddle through' in Afghanistan, I argued for more resources.” Actually, McCain said in 2003 we “may” muddle through, and he recently also called for more troops there.
- He said McCain would fail to lower taxes for 100 million Americans while his own plan would cut taxes for 95 percent of “working” families. But an independent analysis puts the number who would see no benefit from McCain’s plan at 66 million and finds that Obama’s plan would benefit 81 percent of all households when retirees and those without children are figured in.
- Obama noted that McCain’s health care plan would "tax people’s benefits" but didn’t say that it also would provide up to a $5,000 tax credit for families
- Obama said "average family income" went down $2,000 under Bush, which isn't correct. An aide said he was really talking only about "working" families and not retired couples. And – math teachers, please note – he meant median (or midpoint) and not really the mean or average. Median family income actually has inched up slightly under Bush.
Now on the other side McCain
McCain claimed that Obama’s health care plan would "force small businesses to cut jobs" and would put "a bureaucrat ... between you and your doctor." In fact, the plan exempts small businesses, and those who have insurance now could keep the coverage they have.
McCain attacked Obama for voting for "corporate welfare" for oil companies. In fact, the bill Obama voted for raised taxes on oil companies by $300 million over 11 years while providing $5.8 billion in subsidies for renewable energy, energy efficiency and alternative fuels.
McCain said oil imports send "$700 billion a year to countries that don't like us very much." But the U.S. is on track to import a total of only $536 billion worth of oil at current prices, and close to a third of that comes from Canada, Mexico and the United Kingdom.
He promised to increase use of "wind, tide [and] solar" energy, though his actual energy plan contains no new money for renewable energy. He has said elsewhere that renewable sources won’t produce as much as people think.
He called for "reducing government spending and getting rid of failed programs," but as in the past failed to cite a single program that he would eliminate or reduce.
He said Obama would "close" markets to trade. In fact, Obama, though he once said he wanted to "renegotiate" the North American Free Trade Agreement, now says he simply wants to try to strengthen environmental and labor provisions in it.
- There He Goes AgainSeptember 18, 2008
McCain ad misrepresents Obama's tax plan. Again..
Now this is just the tip of the iceberg but my point is that I can find all of this in 30 seconds so why do people take what these politicians say and run with it. Where have their brains gone. Why are "Talking Points" so effective.
It reminds me of someone I work with who lies perpetually. He tells the same lies over and over again and everybody knows it. All of the people that work with me say how can he keep doing this, and I tell them that he tells the lies so often that they become truth to him and as we all know, "Perception is Reality".
One of my favorite songs in the world has a line,
"When it's time to function, as a feeling human being, will your Bachelor of Arts help you get by". This is responded to with, " I hope to study further, a few more year or so, I also hope to keep a steady high".
God were they right when they wrote that, that has to be it, I have answered my question of why do people believe the rhetoric and accept talking points... they are all high!
Thursday, September 18, 2008
When I question a Democrat they argue but will listen and actually sometimes agree with the counter point, but at the end they usually do not feel a the need to question our friendship. The problem is when I disagree with a Republican, I feel attacked and they believe that I am personally attacking their being. They will then actually take it personally enough that they question your friendship. You have just become one of the enemies. Why?
As a very free thinker I do not take anything I hear about or from Politician at face value. I absorbe, research and form my own opinion. There is not a party line in my body. I should be a Republican by all rights given my stature in America however, I consider myself a nice person. I want to do what is right for everyone. It is not my place to tell anyone their beilefs are wrong. I just feel compelled to question everything that is valid. It is the way the world works. It is what lets us grow. In every thing there is a "Thesis" and an "Anti-thesis". When the two are looked into in depth and arguments are made, we usually come up with a "Synthesis" which creates a new "Thesis". ie. the world is flat...(thesis) no it's not(antithesis), someone questions, explores and then comes up with the new Synthesis the world is round. Columbus sails and viola...now we have a new Thesis.
As a Christian, I believe in the scripture and know that Jesus would never approve of me standing in judgement of anyone.
"And Joshua said unto all the people. . . choose you this day whom ye will serve; . . . but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord" (Josh. 24:2, 15).
What does that mean to you? Does it mean he thinks everyone else is wrong and he must try to change them...Does it mean that if they don't believe like he does he will dislike them...does he stand in judgement of anyone? I don't see that. I see a man convicted in his beliefs and knowing that there is no need for him to tell you what you should do. He will do what he thinks is right. You have your beliefs and you are allowed them. That is the gift that God has given us all, the gift of free will.
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
If we look at history, we have Nixon, who was in office when Roe v Wade was passed...republican. Next came Ford...republican. Then there was Reagan, twice...republican. After that there was Bush Sr...republican followed by Bush 2, Twice..republican. That gives us 25 years of republican presidencies with currently 7 of the 9 Supreme Court Justices having been appointed by Republicans.
So why then haven't they changed the law? Do they really have any intention of doing so? Are people so dense that they can't understand that politicians say things so that they can get elected but when it comes to real issues and having to actually do something, there is no interest in what we the people want? Abortion is a talking point, a tool that has been used by the republican party since Roe v Wade to assure that they get their votes.
This is a classic example. People need to start thinking for themselves, voting based upon more than one point, and understand that they do have a say but they must actually get up and say it.